\n\n
The wellness industry wants you to believe you have to optimise every iota of your life to be healthy, and it’s bullshit. In reality, if you do the following, you’re ticking almost all the boxes for being fit and healthy.
\nBody composition – i.e. muscle and body fat – have a pretty strong correlation with increasing or decreasing the risk of all-cause mortality and overall health. For example, excess body fat is linked with increased mortality risk, while this risk decreases as fat-free mass increases. [1]
\nWhen most people hear this, they assume they need to be super shredded. But you might be surprised to learn that the risk associated with body fat tapers off at levels much higher than most people would assume. Jayedi and colleagues found the lowest mortality risk was observed at a BF% of 22% for men and 35% for women. [2]
\nObviously, if you want to get leaner because that’s something you want to do–great. But from a health perspective, leaner doesn’t necessarily mean better.
\nAs for muscle mass––skeletal muscle is an independent marker of metabolic health, and low muscle mass and strength are linked to an increased risk of metabolic disease. [3] And let’s not forget lifting weights can help stave off sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass, quality, and function) and osteopenia (when grandpa fucks around and breaks his hip because he tried being a hero opening a jar of whatever the fuck).
\nI don’t think I need to explain the benefits of regular movement and physical activity to readers of this newsletter. But to contextualise just how detrimental being too sedentary is – being sedentary for 10 hours per day is associated with a 48% increase in the risk of death. When sedentary time increases to 12 hours per day, the risk increases to a whopping 192%. On the other hand, 60 mins of physical activity (regardless of intensity) is associated with a ~50% reduction in the risk of death. [4]
\nHow you do this is up to you. You can do ‘formal’ cardio if you enjoy it, play a sport, or go outside for a walk.
\nYeah, I know ‘zone 2’ cardio is having its 15 minutes of fame. But the intensity matters far less than getting enough movement each day. For example, a recent study found that increasing physical activity, measured by time spent doing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (what zone 2 would fall under) or step counts, was associated with lower risks of death and cardiovascular disease. [5]
\nAs for step count, based on the most recent review on the topic, anywhere between 7,000 and 9,000 steps/day seems to be the optimal dose for reducing mortality risk (though there are slight benefits to doing more). The same study found that each additional 1,000 steps/day was associated with a 9% reduction in all-cause mortality risk. So even a little bit is better than nothing.
\nWhile I won’t go as far as to say “food is medicine,” there is a strong association between diet quality and lower mortality risk from all causes, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. This association may be due to healthier diets lowering inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and providing antioxidants from fruits and vegetables, neutralising harmful substances and protecting cells from damage. [6] [7]
\nFrom a body composition perspective, a healthier diet can help you manage hunger and reduce calorie intake, decreasing the likelihood of gaining excess body fat (see point 1).
\nWhile I tend to stay away from giving concrete guidelines on this stuff, some good guidelines would be:
\nThere’s a popular belief that low levels of alcohol intake provide protective effects against the risk of all-cause mortality. I hate being that guy (I don't–I love it), but this doesn’t seem true.
\nA recent review involving more than 4.8 million people and ~425,000 deaths found that, when all biases and potential confounders were accounted for, low levels of alcohol consumption (<25g/day) didn’t provide protection against the risk of dying from any cause (compared to lifetime nondrinkers). [9]
\nAnd the risk increased as alcohol intake exceeded this amount. According to their analysis, women who drank more than 25g of alcohol per day and men who drank more than 45g of alcohol per day had a higher risk of mortality compared to those drinking less than these amounts.
\nFor example, men who drank 45-<65g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to men who drank 1.3 to <25g per day. This increased to ~43% when alcohol intake increased to ≥65 g/day.
\nConversely, women who drank 25 to <45g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to women drinking 1.30 to <25g of alcohol per day. The risk increased to 35% when women increased their alcohol intake to 45 to <65g of alcohol/day.
\nJust to be clear, I’m not telling you what you should do. But, if we’re going to talk about health, you should be informed about the risks associated with drinking alcohol. (Related.)
\n–––––––––
\nOther than the above, find healthy ways to deal with stress, drink more water (duh), and if you’re not a parent but spend your time before bed doom scrolling, put the phone down and go the fuck to sleep.
\nMost importantly, ignore anyone who makes it any more complicated than this because there’s a very good chance they’re trying to sell you bullshit.
\n\n 🔬 Sauces \n[1] Relation of body fat mass and fat-free mass to total mortality: results from 7 prospective cohort studies, Sedlmeier AM et al. 2021 \n[2] Body fat and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, Jayedi A et al. 2022 \n[3] Impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass on Metabolic Health, Kim G, Kim JH. 2020 \n[4] Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis, Ekelund U et al. 2019 \n[5] Time- vs Step-Based Physical Activity Metrics for Health, Hamaya R et al. 2024 \n[6] The Healthy Eating Index-2015 and All-Cause/Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis, Hao X, Li D. 2024 \n[7] Dietary patterns and biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation: A systematic review of observational and intervention studies, Aleksandrova K et al. 2021 \n[8] Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies of US Men and Women and a Meta-Analysis of 26 Cohort Studies, Wang DD et al. 2021 \n[9] Association Between Daily Alcohol Intake and Risk of All-Cause Mortality, Zhao J et al. 2023 \n |
\nIf you enjoy and find value in my weekly emails, it would mean a lot to me if you could let others know about the Vitamin. It takes me hours to write these emails but it only takes a few seconds to share.
\nYou can share on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, or Email.
\nOr, just copy and paste the link below via email or social media (or however else you want to share):
\n[RH_REFLINK GOES HERE]
\n
\nIf someone forwarded you this email, you can learn more about the Vitamin and subscribe here to get all future issues directly to your inbox. My emails are free, and your information is protected. No spam or any funny business (except for my lame jokes). Unsubscribe at any time.
\n•••
\n–Aa
\nP.S. How did you find this week's instalment of the Vitamin?
\n👍 Loved it | 👎 Hated it
\n
Hey, It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit. The stuff that *actually* mattersThe wellness industry wants you to believe you have to optimise every iota of your life to be healthy, and it’s bullshit. In reality, if you do the following, you’re ticking almost all the boxes for being fit and healthy. Body compositionBody composition – i.e. muscle and body fat – have a pretty strong correlation with increasing or decreasing the risk of all-cause mortality and overall health. For example, excess body fat is linked with increased mortality risk, while this risk decreases as fat-free mass increases. [1] When most people hear this, they assume they need to be super shredded. But you might be surprised to learn that the risk associated with body fat tapers off at levels much higher than most people would assume. Jayedi and colleagues found the lowest mortality risk was observed at a BF% of 22% for men and 35% for women. [2] Obviously, if you want to get leaner because that’s something you want to do–great. But from a health perspective, leaner doesn’t necessarily mean better. As for muscle mass––skeletal muscle is an independent marker of metabolic health, and low muscle mass and strength are linked to an increased risk of metabolic disease. [3] And let’s not forget lifting weights can help stave off sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass, quality, and function) and osteopenia (when grandpa fucks around and breaks his hip because he tried being a hero opening a jar of whatever the fuck). Avoid being too sedentaryI don’t think I need to explain the benefits of regular movement and physical activity to readers of this newsletter. But to contextualise just how detrimental being too sedentary is – being sedentary for 10 hours per day is associated with a 48% increase in the risk of death. When sedentary time increases to 12 hours per day, the risk increases to a whopping 192%. On the other hand, 60 mins of physical activity (regardless of intensity) is associated with a ~50% reduction in the risk of death. [4] How you do this is up to you. You can do ‘formal’ cardio if you enjoy it, play a sport, or go outside for a walk. Yeah, I know ‘zone 2’ cardio is having its 15 minutes of fame. But the intensity matters far less than getting enough movement each day. For example, a recent study found that increasing physical activity, measured by time spent doing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (what zone 2 would fall under) or step counts, was associated with lower risks of death and cardiovascular disease. [5] As for step count, based on the most recent review on the topic, anywhere between 7,000 and 9,000 steps/day seems to be the optimal dose for reducing mortality risk (though there are slight benefits to doing more). The same study found that each additional 1,000 steps/day was associated with a 9% reduction in all-cause mortality risk. So even a little bit is better than nothing. Eat fairly healthy most of the timeWhile I won’t go as far as to say “food is medicine,” there is a strong association between diet quality and lower mortality risk from all causes, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. This association may be due to healthier diets lowering inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and providing antioxidants from fruits and vegetables, neutralising harmful substances and protecting cells from damage. [6] [7] From a body composition perspective, a healthier diet can help you manage hunger and reduce calorie intake, decreasing the likelihood of gaining excess body fat (see point 1). While I tend to stay away from giving concrete guidelines on this stuff, some good guidelines would be:
Limit how much alcohol you consumeThere’s a popular belief that low levels of alcohol intake provide protective effects against the risk of all-cause mortality. I hate being that guy (I don't–I love it), but this doesn’t seem true. A recent review involving more than 4.8 million people and ~425,000 deaths found that, when all biases and potential confounders were accounted for, low levels of alcohol consumption (<25g/day) didn’t provide protection against the risk of dying from any cause (compared to lifetime nondrinkers). [9] And the risk increased as alcohol intake exceeded this amount. According to their analysis, women who drank more than 25g of alcohol per day and men who drank more than 45g of alcohol per day had a higher risk of mortality compared to those drinking less than these amounts. For example, men who drank 45-<65g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to men who drank 1.3 to <25g per day. This increased to ~43% when alcohol intake increased to ≥65 g/day. Conversely, women who drank 25 to <45g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to women drinking 1.30 to <25g of alcohol per day. The risk increased to 35% when women increased their alcohol intake to 45 to <65g of alcohol/day. Just to be clear, I’m not telling you what you should do. But, if we’re going to talk about health, you should be informed about the risks associated with drinking alcohol. (Related.) ––––––––– Other than the above, find healthy ways to deal with stress, drink more water (duh), and if you’re not a parent but spend your time before bed doom scrolling, put the phone down and go the fuck to sleep. Most importantly, ignore anyone who makes it any more complicated than this because there’s a very good chance they’re trying to sell you bullshit. Want to help support me?If you enjoy and find value in my weekly emails, it would mean a lot to me if you could let others know about the Vitamin. It takes me hours to write these emails but it only takes a few seconds to share. You can share on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, or Email. Or, just copy and paste the link below via email or social media (or however else you want to share): [RH_REFLINK GOES HERE] If someone forwarded you this email, you can learn more about the Vitamin and subscribe here to get all future issues directly to your inbox. My emails are free, and your information is protected. No spam or any funny business (except for my lame jokes). Unsubscribe at any time. ••• –Aa P.S. How did you find this week's instalment of the Vitamin? 👍 Loved it | 👎 Hated it |
Heyo, I'm back with another long(ish) form article this week––I know, I know, damn, Aa, two long-form articles back to back? Turns out that when you're only sleeping 5 hours per night, you can actually get way more done. Who knew? Before you dive in, I highly recommend reading this on the website. Not just because it’ll make for a better reading experience, but mainly because the new iOS 18 Mail update might prevent images from loading. And if you’ve read my stuff before, you know the images...
Heyo, I’m fairly confident you’ve heard people (including me) say it’s hard to out-train a bad diet. While that’s true, there’s another side to that phrase that isn't talked about enough: It's equally difficult to out-diet a sedentary lifestyle. In today's article, I want to answer that. Specifically, why physical activity is just as important as your diet when losing fat. You can read the full article here: -> It’s Very Hard to Out-Train a Bad Diet but It’s Equally Difficult to Out-Diet a...
Something I've struggled with for a while now is the realisation that my attention has become increasingly fragmented. This is new to me, and I don't know when it started happening, but it's become more pronounced over the last year or so. I remember a time when I could sit and focus on a task for a solid hour before needing to take a short break. These days, it's hard to get through thirty minutes before my mind starts rebelling. So what's the solution? I don't know. But something I've been...