|
Hey, It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit. The stuff that *actually* mattersThe wellness industry wants you to believe you have to optimise every iota of your life to be healthy, and it’s bullshit. In reality, if you do the following, you’re ticking almost all the boxes for being fit and healthy. Body compositionBody composition – i.e. muscle and body fat – have a pretty strong correlation with increasing or decreasing the risk of all-cause mortality and overall health. For example, excess body fat is linked with increased mortality risk, while this risk decreases as fat-free mass increases. [1] When most people hear this, they assume they need to be super shredded. But you might be surprised to learn that the risk associated with body fat tapers off at levels much higher than most people would assume. Jayedi and colleagues found the lowest mortality risk was observed at a BF% of 22% for men and 35% for women. [2] Obviously, if you want to get leaner because that’s something you want to do–great. But from a health perspective, leaner doesn’t necessarily mean better. As for muscle mass––skeletal muscle is an independent marker of metabolic health, and low muscle mass and strength are linked to an increased risk of metabolic disease. [3] And let’s not forget lifting weights can help stave off sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass, quality, and function) and osteopenia (when grandpa fucks around and breaks his hip because he tried being a hero opening a jar of whatever the fuck). Avoid being too sedentaryI don’t think I need to explain the benefits of regular movement and physical activity to readers of this newsletter. But to contextualise just how detrimental being too sedentary is – being sedentary for 10 hours per day is associated with a 48% increase in the risk of death. When sedentary time increases to 12 hours per day, the risk increases to a whopping 192%. On the other hand, 60 mins of physical activity (regardless of intensity) is associated with a ~50% reduction in the risk of death. [4] How you do this is up to you. You can do ‘formal’ cardio if you enjoy it, play a sport, or go outside for a walk. Yeah, I know ‘zone 2’ cardio is having its 15 minutes of fame. But the intensity matters far less than getting enough movement each day. For example, a recent study found that increasing physical activity, measured by time spent doing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (what zone 2 would fall under) or step counts, was associated with lower risks of death and cardiovascular disease. [5] As for step count, based on the most recent review on the topic, anywhere between 7,000 and 9,000 steps/day seems to be the optimal dose for reducing mortality risk (though there are slight benefits to doing more). The same study found that each additional 1,000 steps/day was associated with a 9% reduction in all-cause mortality risk. So even a little bit is better than nothing. Eat fairly healthy most of the timeWhile I won’t go as far as to say “food is medicine,” there is a strong association between diet quality and lower mortality risk from all causes, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. This association may be due to healthier diets lowering inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and providing antioxidants from fruits and vegetables, neutralising harmful substances and protecting cells from damage. [6] [7] From a body composition perspective, a healthier diet can help you manage hunger and reduce calorie intake, decreasing the likelihood of gaining excess body fat (see point 1). While I tend to stay away from giving concrete guidelines on this stuff, some good guidelines would be:
Limit how much alcohol you consumeThere’s a popular belief that low levels of alcohol intake provide protective effects against the risk of all-cause mortality. I hate being that guy (I don't–I love it), but this doesn’t seem true. A recent review involving more than 4.8 million people and ~425,000 deaths found that, when all biases and potential confounders were accounted for, low levels of alcohol consumption (<25g/day) didn’t provide protection against the risk of dying from any cause (compared to lifetime nondrinkers). [9] And the risk increased as alcohol intake exceeded this amount. According to their analysis, women who drank more than 25g of alcohol per day and men who drank more than 45g of alcohol per day had a higher risk of mortality compared to those drinking less than these amounts. For example, men who drank 45-<65g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to men who drank 1.3 to <25g per day. This increased to ~43% when alcohol intake increased to ≥65 g/day. Conversely, women who drank 25 to <45g of alcohol per day had a 22% increase in risk compared to women drinking 1.30 to <25g of alcohol per day. The risk increased to 35% when women increased their alcohol intake to 45 to <65g of alcohol/day. Just to be clear, I’m not telling you what you should do. But, if we’re going to talk about health, you should be informed about the risks associated with drinking alcohol. (Related.) ––––––––– Other than the above, find healthy ways to deal with stress, drink more water (duh), and if you’re not a parent but spend your time before bed doom scrolling, put the phone down and go the fuck to sleep. Most importantly, ignore anyone who makes it any more complicated than this because there’s a very good chance they’re trying to sell you bullshit. Want to help support me?If you enjoy and find value in my weekly emails, it would mean a lot to me if you could let others know about the Vitamin. It takes me hours to write these emails but it only takes a few seconds to share. You can share on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, or Email. Or, just copy and paste the link below via email or social media (or however else you want to share): [RH_REFLINK GOES HERE] If someone forwarded you this email, you can learn more about the Vitamin and subscribe here to get all future issues directly to your inbox. My emails are free, and your information is protected. No spam or any funny business (except for my lame jokes). Unsubscribe at any time. ••• –Aa P.S. How did you find this week's instalment of the Vitamin? 👍 Loved it | 👎 Hated it |
A reader sent in a question that on the surface should be fairly straightforward to answer: When you are in the bulking phase you can't add just muscle; you will pick up some fat because you need to be in a calorie surplus to build muscle. So for a trained person what is the lowest reasonable expectation for how much fat to muscle will be added in the bulking phase? I understand the reasoning. If you know how much fat and muscle you can expect to gain, you can calculate the target body fat...
Technically, you can out-train a bad diet. If you burn more calories than you consume, you'll lose weight because, thankfully, despite how weird shit's been getting recently, the laws of thermodynamics are still a thing. Still, it raises an interesting question: What happens when you increase physical activity levels? After all, exercise does burn calories, and those calories have to contribute somewhere. I mean, if you went for a run and expected to burn 500 calories, would your daily energy...
We have more fitness information at our fingertips than at any point in human history, and somehow people are still confused about what works and what they should do. Every week there’s a new special diet, a new training protocol, or some broccoli-headed Gen Zer who just discovered tank tops and is now filming TikToks about how you’ve been doing triceps pushdowns wrong your entire life. It’s enough to make you do nothing at all, which, ironically, is the one thing guaranteed to fail. So when...