💊 What everyone gets wrong about Calories


Hey,

It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit.


What everyone gets wrong about Calories

Contrary to what a bunch of shitbiscuits on the internet want you to believe–

A calorie IS a calorie.

Yes, that means exactly what you think it means: 100 calories in a chicken breast are exactly the same as 100 calories in a Snickers bar (the greatest chocolate ever created).

The difference ISN’T the calories – it’s the food composition and, specifically, how different foods are metabolised.

Confused? Don’t worry because we’re about to break this shit down.

––––––

A Calorie (capital C), also known as a kilocalorie (kcal), is simply a unit of energy. Just like kilograms are a unit of mass.

If Jack and Jill both weigh 70 kg, we can confidently say they weigh the same amount. It doesn’t matter if Jack has more muscle, is taller, and would rather throw himself down a hill than go to therapy––they both weigh 70 kg; ergo, they weigh the same.

Can we all agree on this? Good.

Well, the same is true for Calories.

When people say “a Calorie is a Calorie”, they’re highlighting how much energy a food provides our bodies, regardless of the source.

So, again, 100 Calories in a chicken breast are exactly the same as 100 Calories in a Snickers bar because...Yep! You guessed it, they both provide 100 Calories of energy to the body.

Now, remember earlier when I said, “The difference ISN’T the calories – it’s the food composition and, specifically, how different foods are metabolised”?

This is where the differences begin.

––––––

1. Thermic effect of food

The thermic effect of food is how much energy the body uses to digest and store the food you eat. Each macronutrient has a different thermic effect [1]

  • Carbs: 5-10% (i.e. 5-10% of the calories are ‘lost’ to TEF)
  • Protein: 20-30% (i.e. 20-30% of the calories are ‘lost’ to TEF)
  • Fat: 0-3% (you get the idea)

So if you consumed 100 calories from protein, carbs, or fats–

  • Carbs: 90-95 kcals are left over for the body to use
  • Protein: 70-80 kcals are left over for the body to use
  • Fat: 97-100 kcals are left over for the body to use

In order to make this a bit more tangible, let’s welcome back Jack and Jill, who have made a miraculous recovery post-hill death. They both eat a meal that contains ~450 kcals but with very different macronutrient compositions.

Jack’s meal contains relatively more protein, so he'll ‘lose’ 87 kcals to TEF, leaving his body with about 360 kcals to use for energy or storage. In Jack's case, the total TEF of the meal is ~20% (i.e. 20% of the calories were lost during the digestion process).

On the other hand, Jill’s meal is heavy on carbs and fats, so she only 'loses' 44 kcals to TEF, leaving ~400 kcals to be used for energy or storage (a total TEF of about 10%).

Food processing can also impact how many calories are burned during digestion. In one study, the whole food meal required almost double as much energy to digest. [2]

All of this illustrates how the macronutrient profile of your food directly influences the amount of 'usable' calories left for your body to either utilise as energy or store for future use.

––––––

2. Calorie density

Calorie density is a measure of how many Calories are contained in a gram of food, expressed as Calories per gram (kcals/g).

For example, a medium-sized apple (about 100g) contains roughly 50 Calories, while a 50g Snickers bar has 250 Calories.

The Snickers bar is significantly more calorie-dense than the apple.

Why should you give a fuck? Foods with low-calorie density (like fruits, vegetables, and lean proteins) provide fewer calories for a larger volume of food, and therefore you can eat more food for the same number of calories.

For example, you would need to eat 5 medium-sized apples to consume the same number of calories (250 kcals) in one Snickers bar.

Again, the Calories are the same but the volume of food you’re eating differs drastically (which also plays a role in appetite, more on this in a sec)––

Similarly, some foods are nutrient-dense; they contain lots of vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and fiber. You know, all the shit that’s good for you. So while two foods can have the same amount of calories, the impact different foods can have on your health can vary drastically.

––––––

Appetite

And, of course, different foods can impact appetite and satiety differently.

Foods higher in fiber, for example, can increase feelings of fullness since fiber adds ‘bulk’ to the diet and slows down digestion, which can keep you fuller for longer. [3] In fact, some research suggests fiber can promote weight loss independent of caloric intake. [4]

Food processing can also impact how much you eat. Foods that are ‘ultra-processed’ and calorically dense cause people to eat more because heavily processed foods are easier to eat (compare how quickly you can chow down a hamburger patty vs a steak) and contain more calories. [5]

Food texture can also play a role, with solid and viscous (‘thicker’) foods leading to better satiety than liquid or less viscous foods. [6]

Palatability

Some foods are ‘hyperpalatable’, which is just a fancy term for ‘fucking delicious’.

This is why you can deepthroat several Snickers bars before you realise and Jesus, what the fuck? AM I A MONSTER? Yes, probably.

On the other hand, some foods are repugnant, like, you know, kale. Good luck deepthroating that shit.

Therefore, some foods can encourage overeating while other foods don’t.

––––––

Make sense?

Calories are just a measurement of energy. 100 Calories in one food are exactly the same as 100 Calories in another food.

⁣The difference is in the food composition and how your body metabolises different foods (not the Calories).⁣

Some foods are easier to digest, and some foods require more energy to digest (i.e. the thermic effect of food). ⁣

Some foods are more satiating, while others can encourage overeating.

But regardless, ⁣a Calorie is a Calorie. However, food isn’t just food.

⁣There’s a difference.

Congrats! You’re now smarter than 100% of the supposed ‘experts’ spouting dumb shit like “a Calorie isn’t a Calorie.” So save this email for the next time you hear someone say this to slap them with some knowledge (figuratively, ofc. Or maybe literally–you do you, boo).

––––––

If you want to learn more about this topic, I wrote an insanely detailed (but equally entertaining) article on the topic of Calories you can check out here.

📑 Sauces

[1] Diet induced thermogenesis, Westerterp KR. 2004

[2] Postprandial energy expenditure in whole-food and processed-food meals: implications for daily energy expenditure, Barr SB. 2010

[3] Dietary fiber and energy regulation, Burton-Freeman B. 2000

[4] Fiber Intake Predicts Weight Loss and Dietary Adherence in Adults Consuming Calorie-Restricted Diets: The POUNDS Lost (Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies) Study, Miketinas DC et al. 2019

[5] Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods, Forde CG et al. 2020

[6] Food texture influences on satiety: systematic review and meta-analysis, Stribiţcaia E et al. 2020


Share the Vitamin

A lot of time and effort goes into writing these weekly emails.

If you enjoy and find value in them, it would mean a lot to me if you could let others know about the Vitamin.

You can share on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, or Email.

Or, just copy and paste the link below via email or social media (or however else you want to share):

[RH_REFLINK GOES HERE]

If 2 people join using your unique referral link, I'll send you the Vitamin archive – you'll get sent a link with access to all 80+ issues, plus all future issues for free.

You currently have [RH_TOTREF GOES HERE] referrals.

If someone forwarded you this email, you can learn more about the Vitamin and subscribe here and get all future issues directly to your inbox. My emails are free and your information is protected. No spam or any funny business. Unsubscribe at any time.

•••

–Aa

P.S- How did you find this week's instalment of the Vitamin?

👍 Loved it | 👎 Hated it

The Vitamin 💊

Read more from The Vitamin 💊

Heyo, It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit. Are ultra-processed foods bad for you? Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become an ultra-hot research topic in recent years, and for good reason–they now make up more than half of the calories consumed in places like the UK, USA, and the rest of Europe [1, 2]. But let's back up a second. What exactly are 'ultra-processed...

Heyo, There’s a lot of hype around incline walking at the moment – specifically the claim that it’s better for fat burning compared to running. But is this actually true? Let’s find out. Does incline walking burn more fat than running? Let's start with a story – don't worry, it's a great story, and it's starring you and your eternal quest for snacks. You're sitting on the couch and, I dunno, maybe you're three videos deep in a YouTube rabbit hole about why the K-Pop Demon Hunters soundtrack...

Hey, You know how I made all those jokes about "messages from a sponsor", but it was just me slinging my own stuff? Well...in a weird turn of events, The Vitamin is actually sponsored now. If you click any of the links below, I get paid. Worst-case? You find something useful. Best-case? I can afford that Lamborghini. Fine. The Lego Lamborghini. Whatever. This week in the Vitamin: A reader asks how improving your physical fitness would impact your total daily energy expenditure. Read on for my...